Thursday 15 December 2016

NDM News: Globalisation

Globalisation and news


1) Is our news influenced by American cultural imperialism? Give some examples arguing for or against this perspective.
  • Agree: News and institutions are owned by a few billionaires (influencing their ideologies/values)
  • Disagree: British news is world wide coverage whereas American is national
  • Agree: Stories such Brexit being similar to American election (in terms of value and significance)
  • Agree: The way news is presented e.g. 24 hour news (first developed by CNN)
  • Disagree: American T.V has ratings whereas British TV doesn't
  • Disagree: Clickbait is being adopted by British institutions such as the BBC (celebrity articles)
2) Has the increased globalisation of news improved the audience experience? How? Why?
  • Agree: People can get more news stories (from around the world)
  • Disagree: Create moral panics (Donald Trump)= American politics is world politics (affects everyone)
  • Disagree: Come at the cost of local news e.g. Ealing Gazette 
3) Has globalisation benefited or damaged major news institutions? How? Why?
  • Negative: citizen journalism is the loss of control
  • Benefit: Can get content online (no need for staff). They can cover the world cheaper due to technological advances
  • Negative: Google/Facebook has tarnished news institutions, taking their revenue
  • Benefit: Free content for institutions= citizen journalism
  • Negative: citizen journalism can be fake

Globalisation

1) Why was Google Glass controversial?

It is said that the device has the capability to record the user's conversation, meaning it can record conversations (can be without the user's consent) which will be breaching privacy policies that it would potentially gain insight to their whole lifestyle and everyday life. 
Furthermore, The major thing that made Google Glass controversial was the fact that users/customers were afraid that the glass's (due to their 5 megapixel camera) were recording everything they were looking at, their locations and invading their privacy. 

2) What are the positive elements to Globalisation that the article highlights?

One big element was that more people would be getting access to the internet and this would allow them to get more information which is beneficial to them. Google has also allowed there to be internet access in certain parts of New Zealand with balloons which have antennas to provide them with internet. Another positive factor is that it will allow individuals to make informed decisions.

3) What are potential negatives to Globalisation?

The potential is If this happens then there will be less institutions who are in control but also it would influence peoples ideology as there would be access to information whenever they go online but it might not be true if it circulates which people then start to believe that it is real. There will be way too much competition on the online servers, that smaller companies who have the intention to break that barrier, cannot simply do so due to the more dominant firms taking majority of the market share. For example, companies such as Amazon or Ebay are businesses that dominate the shoping market in the online world, making it nearly impossible for smaller firms to compete with them due to the stronger branding and powerful publicity the internet can offer.

4) What is a techno-panic? How does it link to moral panics?

The Issues with the privacy of the device has risen some concerns. The device has the ability to record ones voice and sound nearby as well as record the movement of the user. What is worrying, is that firms such as Google are now trying to invade peoples privacy with the new products their create. This is clearly evident with the Google Glass product, as it has the camera qualities and sound recording mode. Techno panic is created because people are scared that the technology is going to invade their privacy which creates a moral panic because people are worried about this actually happening.

5) What is your opinion on the privacy debate and major corporations being able to access large 
quantities of personal data?

In my opinion I believe that us consumers have to be aware of this technological crisis and need to tackle it in a suitable manor. For example, boycotting the product (and has seen to be quite successful in the past) where the business is inclined to listen to the views of the users and take that forward. Its quote common that privacy invasion has occurred ever since the internet was born, and with every new and fresh technology device, comes a new way of breaching privacy policy for example, finger print scanning.


Media Factsheet: Globalisation and capitalism

1) Who coined the phrase 'a global village' and what multinational companies illustrate this?

The Global Village concept was developed Marshall McLuhan it is the idea that  countries become interconnected  and independent especially in economic terms. BBC is an example of this.

2) What role does Slavoj Zizek suggest the media plays in global capitalism? How can you link this to our previous work on Marxism and Hegemony? 

Capitalism is when there is no free movement of gods and service's with other countries, and 'only' occurs within the country keeping its domestic businesses safe and money within the economy. The reason this links to Marxism is the fact that big named institutions are exploiting the liberal classes in the West by drawing up a perception of helping the 'endangered world' through their brand image. This is clearly linked to Marxism as the powerful ones at the top of the chain want to control the minds of the lower class and gain revenue from it.

3) What does 'capitalism with a conscience' mean? 

Global media has raised awareness about social issues, but in order to sustain (to keep hold of) Western capitalist dominance, institutions have created a marketing campaign that construct this idea of 'capitalism with a conscience'.

4) What is the (PRODUCT) RED campaign? 

it was created to engage the private sector in raising awareness and funds to help eliminate AIDS in Africa.
The RED Brand is not a product in itself, rather it is a brand licensed to partner companies such as Nike, American Express (UK), Apple Inc, Starbucks, Converse, Bugaboo, Penguin Classics (UK & International), Gap, Emporio Armani, Hallmark (US) and Dell.

5) Based on what you've read in the Factsheet, what is YOUR opinion of the (PRODUCT) RED brand? Is it a positive force helping to fight AIDS in Africa or a cynical attempt to make multinational companies look more ethical than they actually are? 

I think that it is a positive thing that is being done because people are now more aware of the cause and if they see a brand which is promoting it that they are associated with they'll be more inclined to go and support it and help create awareness as well on social media websites. It is a private sector company that is trying the eliminate aids in Africa and it came together with lots of other firms such as Nike to raise awareness about this through advertisement.

Monday 12 December 2016

Index

1) Institution: the impact of Google on the newspaper industry
2) Ofcom report: how news consumption has changed
3) The future of newspapers: Build The Wall analysis
4) The decline of newspapers: the effect of online technology
5) The future of journalism: John Oliver and Clay Shirky
6) The decline of newspapers: Media Magazine case studies
7) Citizen journalism and hyper-reality: Media Magazine article and questions
8) News Values: theory and updating them for digital media landcape
9) Marxism & Pluralism: Media Magazine article and questions
10) Alain de Botton on the News: lecture and questions
11) Full NDM essay including paragraphs on Marxism and Pluralism
12) Globalisation and news: cultural imperialism
13) Globalisation: taking it further (Google Glass case study and capitalism)
14) Fake news and globalisation - Guardian and New York Times articles
15) News on the Tweet


Marxism & Pluralism Essay

Marxism & Pluralism Essay

In this essay I'll be exploring the different ways that the development of new digital media has changed the power that the audience has but also the consumption and production of information that audiences consume. 

Nowadays consumers have now become more powerful in terms of the consumption of news that they intake. The institutions that we have are losing the power that they had. This can be seen with the decline with the newspaper industry. It has brought not only media potential, by togetherness within the world. Audiences have become more powerful in terms of consumption and production to a large extent. Since the news has become something that we can access online more and more people have drifted away from accessing the content from a traditional platform such as the newspaper. This can be because of the convenience of accessing it online because of the advances in technology and people want to get the news for free rather than going out and paying for it. 
Institutions such as businesses and media organisations are used to manipulate audience members to purchase a product or consume a piece of news without having the time to challenge them. For example, a news institution like The Sun could have their own ideologies regarding politics and it will simply be consumed by consumers.Things have changed to such an extent, that there has essentially be the opposite. Audience members now have the ability to speak out, In fact institutions who abused their power by inflicting their ideologies upon their consumer base has left a huge impact on their survival as an industry as a whole. Audience's are trying to gain news about the outside world seemed to be a necessity, something that they must obtain, now they can access news for free and can essentially continue to get what they want without even demanding for it. This has lead to a decline in power from institutions in to the hands of the audience member and a Marxist would argue that there would have been at the top of the chain and who were the ones trying to dumb-down audience members in order to attain their power. And to and it is true. We have now become more greedy to getting everything quickly people want news faster so they'll be more advances in technology. Marxists would say that this revolution has done not much benefit the audience.


In addition , The audience have now gotten more news for free online and the institutions need to bring a pay wall so that the journalists don't lose their jobs for example James Murdoch quotes "It is essential for the future of independent digital journalism digital journalism that a fair price can be charged for news to people who value it". What has happened is that customers want to receive their news by a certain institution because they have built a strong relation with it for years and the brand loyalty can take control of them than the Internet can. Institutions such as The Daily Mail have created a strong brand and image to customers, that over the years they will have so many loyal customers they cant really be challenged due to this loyalty. 


Overall, I think that consumers are in power more now because of the advances in technology have meant that they have more freedom and can do exactly what institutions do and new and digital media has brought more power towards the people rather than institutions.

Friday 2 December 2016

NDM: YouTube Star Casey Neistat has been bought by CNN

YouTube Sensation Bought by CNN for $25 Million 

Image result for Casey Neistat


Summary
Casey Neistat is really popular on YouTube he had previously created his own social media-esk app, called BEME. It is essentially an app where followers (and the general public) could share a video for a certain amount of time, by simply holding down the censor on the phone to record. Since Casey had reached a large audience that institutions (to this day) still cant get a grip of; the youth. Casey's prime audience is the young generation and CNN- in order to attract this audience has partnered up with Casey by buying his social media business for $25 million in hope that they will create their own media brand which will target and attract the young demographic.

Statistics
  • Sold BEME for $25 million
  • Has over 5 million YouTube subscribers
Own view

There have been many partnership's with You Tuber's by big named institutions in order to help them gain the audience that these 'figure heads' have. Another example, is Fouseytube. Yousef has had the pleasure of starring in his own Hollywood film. This wasn't simple a random pick. The institution looked at his audience with under 10 million subscribers. I believe this seems like the future for institutions. New and digital media platforms has created the gap in the market to obtain the young generation; something that can grasp hold of their attention and actually entertain them rather than giving them something that they should watch. 

Thursday 1 December 2016

NDM case study: News on the Tweet

NDM case study: News on the Tweet
1.
Respected newsbrands are good for Twitter since it means that the social network, as well as having content coming from citizen journalists and just ordinary citizens in general, there is also things coming from trusted organisations too. With the lack of gatekeeping that takes place on the internet, this goes a long way in boosting the accuracy of information that there is and also helps the network stretch its audience even wider since people will be willing to join it to get up-to-date stories from the newsbrand - increasing ad revenue for Twitter.
2.
Twitter is good for these brands since as said above, it's a way of expanding/widening their audiences even further. As said in the report, 60% of newsbrand followers say that twitter gives them the opportunity to engage with newspaper brands they wouldn't normally read in print format, representative of how the social network even helps these papers increase their readership.
3.
Personally I do feel that old and new media are in direct competition. With the large number of closures and downsizing of newspaper institutions that have gone in this year alone due to the reduction in print revenue being received, partly due to digital giants like Facebook and Google, new and digital media can be viewed sometimes as something of a slow killer to old media. This coexistence can also be said to not really be there as we're now seeing what could be referred to as a 'death of journalism' due to new media, which as a public good is a matter of huge concern within the newspaper industry.

4.


  • Neil Ashton - Arsenal are toast: In all seriousness now, what are the sales figures like for this kind of stuff?
  • Camilla Long - Favourite story all weekend has been Del Boy killing the British sheepskin coat industry. LOL
  • Tom Newton Dunn - Biggest cheer at the Emirates tonight by #AFC? To an announcement for the MUFC away fans that no more trains leaving Euston.


5.

It can generally be said that the reputation of news and journalists isn't really harmed that much by their use of banter, however to a minimal extent it could be thought to damage it. Audience members may end up perceiving posts by journalists like this as being representative of a lack of seriousness and real inclination for journalism amongst them.

6.

The report essentially represents that trust in news stories on Twitter emanates from verification. With this being confirmation that the account is of an authentic nature shown through a blue badge, when users see this then they can be sure that they can trust things being posted from that journalist's account. This means that there isn't any uncertainty on behalf of readers when seeing this content.

7.

New and digital media developments like Twitter can be thought to have had a positive impact on traditional newspapers in the sense that for one, the citizen journalism that is prevalent through it can become part of the stories in these papers. In cases where there aren't journalists on the field able to report on an event, using things like images that come from ordinary citizens on Twitter can be very helpful in forming news stories. However of course, an issue creeps up in that these same new and digital media developments are contributing heavily to the ongoing death of print media (newspapers) through factors such as the immediacy they have in getting stories across and also easier accessibility.

8.

With the influx of fake news that's been coming through Facebook, perhaps what needs to be done which has already been suggested, is clearly marking out stories that have been published by respected newsbrands. By separating these articles from all the others then it'll be clear to audiences that they need to be more wary when reading stories that aren't actually from these brands. A system like this could be compared to how Twitter has its 'verified' system which was described above.